Op-Ed

End recourse is a process, one endlessly practiced. Shadows come forth in well-developed persons. Nature still bests the results of all but the real article. Tossed about the ethics puzzle, not part of any constitution, akratics struggle with any subject. They distill things deemed worthy of discussion thinly, depending on the tolerated modern triad of discipline, which has no history of authenticity, instead only myths and legends.

More than this, a judgment act of any kind implies the who, what, where and when, especially where rage or revenge are more empirical in the real than the imagined. Within the act of either rage or revenge [always only one] there reaches in somehow this weakness, a desert, and oddly a great distance from the true appetite. If apparently the good they never choose, such as the imprudent, claiming no hand in any other assessment or outcome, the decision is commonly of not choosing at all. Such a go of wants is only a trick, as one always has two choices : to choose or not to choose. Between them, each are leading the case where what is taken is one’s own staying away from the choice, also an act of the weak.

Another explanation for this weakness is that the facts are worth esteem. Being formulated into judgment, one without the means holds relationships as victims. Seeking and deciding are doling all-things-considered because the subset stages are practical - the same as rage against revenge. No decision or opinion, this indulgence is the company of murderers.

Broken down, to believe in the act as a judgment implies reasoning, however, the mission brings the ordinary rather than the better or best. Revenge naturally will lead as the strength of revenge fulfills the desires, sees endless examples before it, and so enumerates the appetite in lieu of authentic and hard-earned satisfaction.

To boot, flinching, the victim seeks then similar decisions to climb out from under the rage of the revenge taken upon them. Again, believing and choosing in only the weak way.

Many of these moments feel within reason, toward a possible opinion to out-weak considerations of another’s will. One course : in friends. Such systems result in only temporarily undoing views based on locating something akin to feeling, a problem illusion that leads to more of the same rather than a solution or reprieve. Under opposed questions, with plastic belief, knowledge works against us and merely imitates the aligned while deeply some conflict denies the view, hiding any clear conceptual framework to behave according to the kind of consistent rationale that can track a solution.

waxieus is waxieus is the god of adaptation. he is capable of communicating with and relating to any culture and/or sensibility, thus, able to navigate nimbly through most any environment with a voracious appetite and knack for learning his way around. his weakness? well, he has no individual culture of his own, instead he's a rather strict product of environment. waxieus makes choices based on experiences and intuition rather than established forms and functions. he tells it like it is, without sentimentality but not without care.
Email this author | All posts by waxieus